The Dark Side of FDA Approval
How Oversight Agencies Became Complicit in the Crime of the Century
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Disease Control (CDC), National Institute of Health (NIH), and similar agencies underneath the federal executive are framed as guardians of public health and welfare. These agencies were created to make sure that the food, medical products, and anything else that could potentially be dangerous to our health were regulated. We credit these agencies with being integral to the abolition of many extremely dangerous communicable diseases like chickenpox.
Throughout the pandemic, these agencies have lost credibility due to their inability to decide on a specific course of action, guidelines, or recommendations to keep the public safe. At first, the CDC suggested that the average citizen not wear masks because it will not prevent them from contracting the novel coronavirus, after months of advocating healthy people not wear masks the CDC changed their position and said that healthy people should wear TWO masks on April 3, 2020. After that, the CDC switched back to the position that ONE mask was sufficient to prevent the acquisition of the Coronavirus.
Then their role in the pandemic switched from being reactive to proactive with the launch of President Trump’s Project Warpspeed. As Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen, and other companies worked to develop a vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 these agencies were responsible for making sure the cure was not worse than the disease. From the very beginning, questions about the objectivity, diligence, and transparency from the pharmaceutical companies and their regulatory agencies.
From the jump, the process of testing the vaccine was always going to be lackluster comparatively given the time frame of the development. What little medical trials they did conduct however were corrupted quickly by members of the control group being allowed to take the vaccine within months of the trials beginning.
NPR published a story on February 19, 2021, titled, “Long-Term Studies Of COVID-19 Vaccines Hurt By Placebo Recipients Getting Immunized.” In this article they say
[E]verybody else who had the placebo shot went ahead and got the actual vaccine. So now Fierro has essentially no comparison group left for the ongoing study.
“It’s a loss from a scientific standpoint, but given the circumstances I think it’s the right thing to do,” he says.
People signing up for these studies were not promised special treatment, but once the FDA authorized the vaccines, their developers decided to offer the shots.
Dr. Steven Goodman, a clinical trials specialist at Stanford University, says losing those control groups makes it more difficult to answer some important questions about COVID-19 vaccines.
One huge concern that goes completely unmentioned here is how this makes tracking side effects from receiving the vaccine. Given that every database set up to document adverse events has seen exponentially more inputs from this vaccine compared to any other approved pharmaceutical drug, this is extremely important information.
The FDA, which conducted this clinical trial NPR was reporting on, is undoubtedly aware of these adverse events as well. Last spring, the FDA released a document (5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis Of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports Of Pf-07302048 (Bnt162b2) Received) covering every type of adverse event, caused by the Covid-19 vaccines, that had been reported to them through February 28, 2021, just 9 days after the NPR article was published. There is an 8-page appendix on this report which lists, in alphabetical order, every documented adverse event of interest.
These are all documented adverse events of interest all before the vaccine had been widely distributed or administered. The FDA, CDC, NIH, and other agencies failed by rushing a vaccine that utilized brand new mRNA technology, through the approval process quickly, for a virus that was not in any way dangerous to most of the country.
Another failure through the testing process was the significance of mRNA’s impact on the recipient’s DNA. The fact-checkers are wrong again on this one. Reuters published a rare “double wrong” fact check titled “COVID-19 vaccines do not alter a recipient’s DNA and U.S. FDA does not list death as a side effect.”
First of all, the 7th page of the appendix referenced above lists “sudden unexplained death in epilepsy” as one of the adverse events of interest.
Plus, wIth the new study out of Sweden conducted by professors at Lund University, we know that the mRNA vaccines can alter your DNA in as little as 6 hours. They found,
Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to LINE-1 expression and distribution changes. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 hours upon BNT162b2 exposure.
Yet, despite these findings, the corrupted clinical trials, and mountains of adverse events the agencies supposedly put in place to protect the people from these exact threats, are working to have any who bring up this data censored for “misinformation.” The FDA, CDC, NIH, and others are now actively working to undermine public health rather than protect it.
