fbpx
Home SITREP 08.23.2021

08.23.2021

by Survival Dispatch Staff

The Enemy Within

How Governments Create Problems Not Solutions

We in the modern west have been blessed beyond belief with the world we have been able to call our own. The problem with so much success, those who did not have to struggle to create the status quo, particularly the younger generations, are naive to both the delicacy of the status quo and the effort required to regain it once lost. 

There is no greater example of that than the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic by governments all over the world. They have created fear, repressed data contradictory to their narrative, and stripped people of their rights in the name of public health. The truth is your government is the greatest public health threat to your family and country. 

The FDA granting approval for the Pfizer-BioNTech-Covid-19 Vaccine will usher in a new series of public and private vaccine mandates for private citizens. You will no longer be able to make your own health decisions, if you refuse the vaccine you will be deprived of your opportunity to participate in society unless you hand over your bodily autonomy. Although a year ago it would have been unimaginable, it is now common practice for police, military personnel, or volunteer enforces of the state to beat noncompliant individuals in order to protect their health. New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, the Philippines, bluer areas of the United States are all under the rule of a pseudo militarized public health administrative state.

The concerted efforts of corporate media, big tech, public health “experts,” and illegitimate government authoritarianism have stampeded the masses into hysteria about a problem that statistically doesn’t exist. Sweden became infamous during the early months of the pandemic for not locking down. Children went to school, adults went to the bars, and families went to church throughout the peak of hysteria in other countries. 

How did they fare? Was their population cut in half? No, in fact looking at the last 5 years of data from the Swedish government, there was no change at all in excess deaths throughout the country. The argument has been that Covid-19 manifests itself differently among different populations, and therefore there is no way to know that all countries would have been as inconsequential impacted by the virus. This defense is an impossible statement to disprove, the more intellectually honest analysis of the situation would be that a study of 10.4 million people should be enough to warrant reconsideration of your public health policy. Particularly when the said policy is responsible for huge surges in mental health, addiction, domestic abuse, and other serious societal problems. 

As we have previously covered, 

Are the lockdowns that the government is trying to enforce with every totalitarian tactic available to them a good solution? According to science, absolutely not. New statistics from Canada analyze the provisional death totals and excess mortality nationwide between January 2020 and April 2021. According to government data, 1,380 Canadians under the age of 65 died from Covid-19, as compared to 5,535 excess deaths attributable to the lockdowns. 

The logic used to justify the implementation of national lockdowns is that “if it saves even one life it is worth it.” Although this may seem to be a good moto for authorities to use, there is no limiting principle on the statement which means in practice it is a subjective tool to be used by ill-intentioned actors such as our governments. 

The government would save lives if it outlawed driving, prevented the sale of fast food, and mandated everyone walk around covered in bubble wrap, yet we don’t have activists calling for any of these extreme measures. The reason no one is outside the Florida Department of Transportation protesting the 70 miles per hour speed limit, is not because there are not people who couldn’t be convinced to do so, but because there is not a compelling interest for anyone to encourage it. 

Such a social movement, regardless of how well-intentioned, would not have created a trillion-dollar industry, allowed the government to consolidate its power, or turn previously free people into subservient sheep. There has been an attempt to implicate the unvaccinated crowd as the culprit for the creation of wealth from this pandemic, which is simply absurd. Cynthia Cox, the Vice President of the Kaiser Family Foundation, tweeted out the following graph. 

In a rebuttal titled “The Slumlord of Public Health Reasoning,”

The US treasury — (the working people’s money, the rich siphon it the working people actually pay into it) — has spent on so-called preventative “covid” care for the HALF of the country that is jabbed over $1 trillion so far, with production, marketing and distribution, and there is no end to this level of expense in sight. Additionally for post-jab care of this half of the population, for so-called “breakthrough” covid cases and for vax induced myocarditis, pericarditis, heart attacks, Guillain-Barré, clots, seizures, anaphylaxis, shingles, reactivated lyme, etc of those covered by public programs, about another $2 billion minimum.

In contrast: For TOTAL “covid” care for the wicked UNVACCINATED half of the population, the public treasury spent under a billion dollars in the same period.

Again: the vaccinated 50% of the population has already spent over one thousand times more public money on their “covid” care than the unvaccinated.

This is the problem with the entire flow of information being controlled by the same people, if something is too damaging to their agenda to be let into the public consciousness it is relatively easy to keep it from reaching critical mass. Social media companies will delete people who talk about it, prevent it from being shared, and flag it as misinformation. Corporate media will attack the source of the information as Russian misinformation, call into doubt the character of the individual who brought the information to light, or they do not cover it at all. Finally, the government itself, especially the administrative state, will leverage the infinite sources at their disposal to crack down on anyone tangentially associated with the unauthorized truth. 

If that sounds like a totalitarian dystopian novel that should be adapted for a Hollywood box office hit, every example is taken from the news in the last 18 months. Now, the same governments that have flip-flopped on every issue, withdrawn approval for multiple therapeutics, vaccines, and chemicals, and coerced you into participating in the largest human study in history have approved the Pfizer-BioNTech-Covid-19 vaccine for general public use. They would rather you forget the fact that the clinical studies are not even scheduled to wrap up until early 2023. “For the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, for example, the primary completion date is October 2021, and the estimated study completion date is April 2023.” 

The FDA makes no attempt to hide the ambiguity, and possible seriousness, of the side effects of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine. In their release this morning, the Administration writes, 

Postmarketing data demonstrate increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within 7 days following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age than among females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Although some cases required intensive care support, available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had resolution of symptoms with conservative management. Information is not yet available about potential long-term sequelae.

(Emphasis added)

I will leave you with the list of the top eight adverse reactions for participants in the study between the ages of 16 and 55, “the most commonly reported adverse reactions (≥10%) were pain at the injection site (88.6%), fatigue (70.1%), headache (64.9%), muscle pain (45.5%), chills (41.5%), joint pain (27.5%), fever (17.8%), and injection site swelling (10.6%).” 

Any adverse reaction that was seen in 10.5%> of cases would therefore not have appeared in this list, regardless of how severe. 

0 comment

Related Articles

Leave a Comment