fbpx
Home SITREP 08.02.2021

08.02.2021

by Survival Dispatch Staff

Follow The Science

Covid Medical Literature

For a year and a half, the medical administrative bureaucracy has been dictating every aspect of American life without accountability or oversight. They have derived their authority from “The Science™” which has placed them, and their dictates, beyond reproach. Their orders have been so contradictory, however, that even the ill-informed observer has begun to question the legitimacy of the CDC, WHO, and public health experts in general. 

Rather than merely pointing out the inconsistencies of their statements, let us do what they want. Let us follow the science and see what unbiased, data-driven decisions would look like. 


In an analysis by Dr.’s Michael Palmer and Sucharit Bhakdi published on July 23rd titled “The Pfizer mRNA Vaccine: Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity,” they write:

We summarize the findings of an animal study which Pfizer submitted to the Japanese health authorities in 2020, and which pertained to the distribution and elimination of a model mRNA vaccine. We show that this study clearly presaged grave risks of blood clotting and other adverse effects. The failure to monitor and assess these risks in the subsequent clinical trials, and the grossly negligent review process in conjunction with the emergency use authorizations, have predictably resulted in an unprecedented medical disaster.

What is this medical disaster? According to the Covid-19 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data, the vaccine has been responsible for 11,940 deaths, 40,991 hospitalizations, and 65,067 urgent care visits in the United States. If you are concerned by these totals, you should be. According to data acquired via FOI in the United Kingdom, the Covid-19 vaccines are responsible for more reactions than all other new vaccines over the past 11 years. 

How reliable are VAERS? Dr. David Graham, the Acting Chief, Epidemiology Branch Center for Drug Evaluation and Research of the FDA, actually studied this question for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, and Staff College. In the MedWatch article they reveal:

Another major concern with any spontaneous reporting system is underreporting of adverse events. It has been estimated that rarely more than 10% of serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), and 2-4% of non-serious reactions, are reported to the British spontaneous reporting program. A similar estimate is that the FDA receives by direct report less than 1% of suspected serious ADRs. This means that cases spontaneously reported to any surveillance program, which comprise the numerator, generally represent only a small portion of the number that have actually occurred.

Applying these findings to the VAERS data we have for the Covid-19 vaccine paints a concerning picture given the already unprecedented risk associated with getting the jab. Almost every analysis of the benefit versus cost of receiving the vaccine stems from the use of this VAERS data, which we have known for 25 years to be critically under the actual numbers. Even using this underreported data the findings are conflicted. 

According to an article in the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) journal, titled, “The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy,” found reason to doubt continued vaccine rollout was not in violation of the Hippocratic oath. Harold Watch, et al. found:

The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy. […] Currently, our estimates show that we have to accept four fatal and 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations in order to save the lives of 2–11 individuals per 100,000 vaccinations, placing risks and benefits on the same order of magnitude.

Another example of the concern those aware of the ADR rate has raised, is a letter from the Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, ascribing a “Yellow Card Warning” to the Covid-19 vaccines. The Director of the consulting agency, Dr. Tess Lawrie, highlighted the abnormally high number of reported reactions and urged the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) to publish all available information. 

These same institutions, authorities, and corporations who told us the lockdowns were necessary even if they saved one life, seem to be unphased by the alarming rate of reactions, hospitalizations, and deaths from the vaccine. Their push for vaccination was not the only counterproductive one, the lockdowns themselves according to research from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER): 

We failed to find that countries or U.S. states that implemented SIP policies earlier, and in which SIP policies had longer to operate, had lower excess deaths than countries/U.S. states that were slower to implement SIP policies. We also failed to observe differences in excess death trends before and after the implementation of SIP policies based on pre-SIP COVID-19 death rates.

In continuing their pattern of misguiding the American people, public health experts have continuously informed us that natural immunity will not last beyond a few months. Ironically enough, the vaccine seems to be much less effective than natural immunity, with a shorter life span, hence the booster shots that will be needed to make Pfizer an additional $100 billion every year. According to the “Nature Communication” journal, being exposed to SARS-CoV-2, even if asymptomatic, creates T-cell mediated immunity. 

Building on these findings, an article published by the National Center for Biotechnology Information section of the National Institute of Health addressed the durability of this immunity. Kristen W. Cohen et al., revised on June 18, 2021, explain, “Here, we evaluate 254 COVID-19 patients longitudinally up to 8 months and find durable broad-based immune responses. SARS-CoV-2 spike binding and neutralizing antibodies exhibit a bi-phasic decay with an extended half-life of >200 days suggesting the generation of longer-lived plasma cells.” 

The truth is, everything that has been done in the name of public health over the last 18 months could have been motivated by a lot of factors, protecting the health of the public is not one of them. Everything that we have been told by the institutions and experts since the “pandemic” began has been a half-truth or flat-out lie. 

Vaccines are not safe or approved, lockdowns do not work, and masks do not work. If you are vaccinated, you can both spread and catch Covid-19. If you did have Covid-19, you are better protected. The VAERS data as it is creates serious cause for concern, but the true numbers, which we may never know, could be catastrophic. As Dr. Palmer and Bhakdi said, this is an unprecedented medical disaster. 

In Other News 

5 Headlines You Might Have Missed

  1. Chinese Technology ETF’s have dropped over 50% of their value amid a larger Chinese stock-price collapse. 
  2. The Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley are confirmed to be paying for at least two full hotels to house illegal migrants the Biden Administration have released. 
  3. The Biden Administration has launched an effort to convince the unvaccinated by partnering with TikTok stars as part of what they are calling, “an influencer army.”
  4. The latest installment of the hypocritical ruling class elites, Obama is expecting 700 guests to celebrate his birthday at his $14 million mansion in Martha’s Vineyard. 
  5. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation holds close to $2 Billion in Johnson & Johnson stock and was one of the main financial backers of FactCheck.org which targeted vaccine hesitancy among other “misinformation” online. 
0 comment

Related Articles

Leave a Comment